Updated April 5, 2023
Introduction to Exynos 2100 vs A14 Bionic
The Exynos series of mobile processors are built by Samsung for many years now. It is mostly used in high-end Samsung smartphones. In 2021, Samsung launched Exynos 2100 as its latest mobile processor. This mobile processor is an up-gradation of the Exynos 990 which was launched last year and was seen in mobile phone likes Samsung Galaxy S20 series. On the other hand, A14 bionic is built by Apple. It is a system on chip 64-bit ARM v8.5a. It is used in iPhone 12, iPad Air, iPhone 12 Pro Max, iPhone 12 Mini, and iPhone 12 Pro. It is said that the Apple A14 Bionic makes the central processing unit performance 40% better than A12. Moreover, the graphics processing unit performs 30% faster than A12. The A14 Bionic consists of a 16-core neural engine and machine learning matrix accelerators which makes the performance ten times faster.
Head to Head Comparison Between XAMPP vs MAMP (Infographics)
Below are the top 18 differences between XAMPP vs MAMP:
Comparison Table of Exynos 2100 vs A14 Bionic
|
Exynos 2100 |
A14 Bionic |
| 1. The Samsung Exynos 2100 has an image compression rate of 170.5 Mpixels per second. | 1. The Apple A14 Bionic has an image compression rate of 174.85 Mpixels per sec. |
| 2. The face detection rate of Samsung Exynos 2100 is 26.7 images per second. | 2. The face detection rate of Apple A14 Bionic is 33.7 images per second. |
| 3. The speech recognition rate of Samsung Exynos 2100 is 64.15 words per second. | 3. The speech recognition rate of Apple A14 Bionic is 95.65 words per second. |
| 4. The machine learning rate of Samsung Exynos 2100 is 51.35 images per second. | 4. The machine learning rate of Apple A14 Bionic is 95.85 images per second. |
| 5. The camera shooting rate of Samsung Exynos 2100 is 33.9 images per second. | 5. The camera shooting rate of Apple A14 Bionic is 38.45 images per second. |
| 6. The HTML 5 rate of Samsung Exynos 2100 is 3.21 Mnodes per second. | 6. The HTML 5 rate of Apple A14 Bionic is 4.59 Mnodes per second. |
| 7. The SQLite rate of searches in Samsung Exynos 2100 is 970.15 thousand rows per second. | 7. The SQLite rate of searches in Apple A14 Bionic is 1060 thousand rows per second. |
| 8. There are three major architectures in Samsung Exynos 2100, which are 1x 2.9 GigaHertz – Cortex – X1, 3x 2.8 GigaHertz – Cortex – A78, 4x 2.2 GigaHertz – Cortex – A55. | 8. The two major architectures in Apple A14 Bionic, which are 2x 2.99 GigaHertz – Firestorm, 4x 1.8 GigaHertz – Ice storm. |
| 9. Samsung Exynos 2100 is an 8 core processor. | 9. Apple A14 bionic is a 6 core processor. |
| 10. The frequency of the Samsung Exynos 2100 is 2900 Megahertz. | 10. The frequency of Apple A14 Bionic is 2990 Megahertz. |
| 11. The instruction set of Samsung Exynos 2100 is ARMv8.4-A. | 11. The instruction set of Apple A14 Bionic is ARMv8.4. |
| 12. The L3 cache of Samsung Exynos 2100 is undisclosed till now. | 12. The L3 cache of Apple A14 Bionic is 8MB. |
| 13. The transistor count of the Samsung Exynos 2100 is still undisclosed. | 13. The transistor count of Apple A14 Bionic is 11.8 billion. |
| 14. The Thermal design power of the Samsung Exynos 2100 is 9 W. | 14. The Thermal Design Power of Apple A14 Bionic is 6W. |
| 15. The graphics processor unit’sname of Samsung Exynos 2100 is Mali – G78 – MP14. | 15. The graphics processor unit’s name of Apple A14 Bionic is Apple Graphics Processor Unit. |
| 16. The Architecture of Samsung Exynos 2100 graphics is Vallhall 2. | 16. The Architecture of Apple A14 Bionic graphics is undisclosed. |
| 17. The graphics processor unit of Samsung Exynos 2100 has a frequency of 760 MegaHertz. | 17. The frequency of the graphics processor unit of Apple A14 Bionic is still undiscovered. |
| 18. The execution units of Samsung Exynos 2100’s graphics processing unit is 14. | 18. The execution unit of Apple A14 Bionic’s graphics processing unit is 4. |
Key Differences of Exynos 2100 vs A14 Bionic
Samsung’s Exynos 2100 Processor has a core that is introduced for the tasks which require higher performance ratings. The Exynos 2100 has ARM Cortex X1 as its central processing unit which has a clock speed of 2.9 Giga Hertz. On the other hand, Apple’s A14 bionic has the first 2x cores for performing high-performance tasks. The Apple Firestorm cores have a clock speed of 2.99 Gigahertz.
Samsung’s Exynos 2100 has three cores installed into it for low-performance tasks. It has an ARM Cortex A78 as its central processing unit which has a clock speed of 2.8 Giga Hertz. On the other hand, the Apple A14 Bionic chip has the first 4x cores which have been installed for performing tasks with higher efficiency. Apple’ Icestorm has this type of core installed into it. This makes the chip reach the clock speed of 1.8 Giga Hertz.
If we consider both the Exynos 2100 and Apple 14 Bionic in terms of clock speeds then Apple’s A14 with a single core would have a slight edge over Exynos 2100 with a higher clock speed. However, in terms of Multicore, Exynos 2100 has a lot to offer with a higher clock speed as compared to Apple’s A14 Bionic Chip.
If we consider the central processing unit’s fabrication process of both Exynos 2100 and A14 bionic then a 5nano meter fabrication process has been used for their building. However, Exynos 2100 uses the 5nano meter process of Samsung while Apple’s A14 Bionic uses the 5 nanometer process of TSMC.
The processor used in Samsung’s Exynos 2100 processor is an octa-core processor of 64 bit. This means that eight cores are installed under this processor for multi-tasking and task distribution. On the other hand, Apple’s A14 Bionic chip uses a Hexa Core processor of 64 bit. This means that there are six cores installed in A14 Bionic’s processor for multi-tasking and task distribution.
Conclusion
On the basis of this article, we understood the major differences between Samsung’s Exynos 2100 and Apple’s A14 Bionic system on chip (SoC). We went through their difference on the basis of architecture, performance, clock speed, graphics processing unit, central processing unit, and many more. This article would help the readers to understand the pros and cons of both these chips.
Recommended Articles
This is a guide to Exynos 2100 vs A14 Bionic. Here we discuss Exynos 2100 vs A14 Bionic key differences with infographics and comparison table, respectively. You may also have a look at the following articles to learn more –
