Updated April 19, 2023
Difference Between NativeScript vs Flutter
The following article provides an outline for NativeScript vs Flutter. NativeScript is defined as an open-source framework for building cross-platform applications that means these are used for building truly native applications with cross-platform applications such as TypeScript, JavaScript, Vue or AngularJS, etc which has a rendering engine that provides user experience and native performance and hence these are used for the development of mobile apps of iOS. Flutter is also defined as a framework which is written in a dart programming language which is created by Google and that also is known as an Extended version of UI toolkits that usually are used for building single codebase cross-platform applications which means they provide accessibility develop flexible UI native performance.
Head to Head Comparison Between NativeScript vs Flutter (Infographics)
Below are the top 10 differences between NativeScript vs Flutter:
Key Difference Between NativeScript vs Flutter
Let us discuss some of the major key differences between NativeScript vs Flutter:
- Code Reusability: Flutter offers high reusability of code where the widgets would not adapt to underlying platforms instead we need to use material design on both platforms that are widgets can be switched based on the platforms and its iconic score in terms of reusability. Whereas NativeScript also provides very good code reusability wherein thin many components automatically adjust and compiler to their native equivalents and hence it does not require re-styling instead can manage only those components that are not in both platforms.
- Ease of Building a Web Version: Flutter allows us to use the same codebase for building the web versions but when we do this the web version which built looks like a mobile app. Whereas NativeScript can also reuse code to build the web version and it uses UIs to rebuild which would be much faster and easier than flutter.
- Features: Flutter is best at some features like Hot-reloading which helps the apps up-gradation immediately without losing apps state, it provides rich widgets, seamless integration with Java for Android and Swift for iOS, codesharing is easier and faster, quick shipping by providing quick iteration cycles. Whereas NativeScript features are Native functionality that can help access native device API via native components, cross-technology compatibility which allows data binding and component reusability with Typescript or Angular or Javascript, and another feature like it provides extensibility which gives complete and direct access to all kind of Android and iOS APIs.
- Building of Complex Apps: Flutter is not much suitable for developing complex apps but it can be a good option for building MVP which can also build faster prototypes. Whereas, NativeScript is more suitable for building complex or advanced apps than any other frameworks along with high performance. These frameworks provide official documents which consist of guidelines, third-party libraries, plugins, etc for developing complex apps.
- Best User Experience: Flutter provides the best user experience with customized widgets, simplified tools, and elements where the garbage collection feature in this framework helps to create UI frames for object codes. Whereas, NativeScript also provides the best user experience for building enterprise-level business apps with customized free professional-grade UI elements. We should properly choose the frameworks as user experience is a vital element in developing any apps.
NativeScript vs Flutter Comparison Table
Let’s discuss the top comparison between NativeScript vs Flutter:
| Sr. No | NativeScript | Flutter |
| 1 | It is also an open-source framework that can transpile one programming language to another for building truly native apps using Typescript, JavaScript, AngularJS, etc. | It is both an open-source framework and SDK with dart language that is used to build cross-platform apps with a single codebase using an enhanced UI toolkit. |
| 2 | NativeScript also is transmitted with some of the pre-configured components that are usually used for developing the user interface apps whereas it works with its component as it does not work with HTML. | Flutter is transmitted with a bunch of pre-configured widgets such as buttons, layouts, tabs, etc and such widgets are used as building blocks in developing own widgets and also to develop more complex widgets. |
| 3 | This offers an intermediate performance that is neither high nor low whereas it offers at par with more cross-platform frameworks. These optimize their performance by using some merging manual tool instrumentation. | This offers a better performance as it does not require any communication bridge between native modules. Therefore this uses skia graphics library that helps the UI to update the changes in the apps view which will, in turn, makes the flutter perform more efficiently. |
| 4 | NativeScript supports MVC or MVMM architecture pattern that can enable a set of features which has the structure of NativeScript composed with multiple modules. | Flutter supports an architecture framework that starts with a top-level root function that can interact with rendering layers and platforms. |
| 5 | It offers an app’s default testing capabilities with its own QA workflow and hence can directly integrate unit testing into default CLI. | It supports automated testing with several testing features along with detailed documentation. |
| 6 | Tools that can integrate with NativeScript are Jscrambler, Android OS, Tipe, Ios, Game Analytics, LokiJS, etc. | Tools that can integrate with flutter are Android SDK, Dart, Outbrain, Google AdMob, Firebase, Socket.IO, etc. |
| 7 | The community support for NativeScript is comparatively lagging but some new initiatives like NativeScript-Vue are gaining some of the community support. | The community support for flutter is growing as it is new. |
| 8 | In case of NativeScript can be considered as tempting language as its NativeScript Vue.JS is easy to read and understand and also has no any such styling in the code. | Flutter cannot be tempting language as it is written in Dart programming language which is verbose and it uses some style or theming functions in a separate file to make the code reusable. |
| 9 | NativeScript also provides a good command-line interface along with 1200 libraries. | Flutter provides a good command-line interface along with 3246 libraries. |
| 10 | Debugging take lots of time in NativeScript as it leads to errors when compiling types that are not respected. | Debugging in flutter is quite easy as it uses dart language which is typed language. |
Conclusion
In this article, we conclude that both flutter and NativeScript frameworks are better in their way and have a different set of advantages and disadvantages. So if developers are using Vue.JS or Angular then they can go for NativeScript framework, whereas if the developers are using typed language then they can go for Flutter framework as it functions with dart language which is also typed language.
Recommended Articles
This is a guide to NativeScript vs Flutter. Here we discuss the NativeScript vs Flutter key differences with infographics and comparison table. You may also have a look at the following articles to learn more –
