Updated April 7, 2023
Difference between SecureCRT vs Putty
SecureCRT stands for Rock-solid terminal emulation for computing professionals which provides a rock-solid emulating terminal to perform any computational activity intern giving high productivity. It is not cost-friendly due to which professionals prefer to work with Putty. Putty is a free ssh and telnet platform which is used for maintaining many of the source code that is developed and is user-friendly. SecureCRT is more robust and has a lot many functionalities with plugins that is used for telnet communication, unlike Putty which has little fewer features compared to SecureCRT for manipulation.
Head to Head Comparison Between SecureCRT vs Putty (Infographics)
Below are the top 7 differences between SecureCRT vs Putty:
Comparison Table of SecureCRT vs Putty
| SecureCRT | Putty |
| SecureCRT is a type of rock-solid terminal emulator which is used for many of the purpose related to network elements and manipulation. | On the other hand, Putty is a terminal that also serves the same purpose but still is used in bulk for most of the recommended developers. |
| SecureCRT is not that much cost-effective and is not open source due to which it is not much recommended as compared to Putty. | Putty on the other hand is cost-effective and is used for various connectivity and is used a lot by most of the developers. |
| SecureCRT as a terminal is ranked 6th by the slant community for manipulation. | Putty as a terminal is ranked 3rd by the slant community for manipulation. |
| SecureCRT is considered more secured than Putty as it involves some strong encryption patterns when compared to Putty. | Putty is not considered as much secured as SecureCRT although it also supports for many encryption patterns to maintain security. |
| SecureCRT has a lot of options and features when compared to Putty. | On the other hand, Putty has less options, plugins, and featured when compared to SecureCRT. |
| For SecureCRT, another or external client for SSH needs to be installed. | On the other hand Putty need not have to install any of the external plugin or client SSH for any manipulation. |
| SecureCRT is more flexible when compared to Putty in terms of accessibility and advanced session management for the network elements.
|
Putty on other hand, when compared to SecureCRT, is not that flexible although it has almost all the features for session management of network elements it is not that advanced. |
Key Differences of SecureCRT vs Putty
There are lots of key differences that persist within the SecureCRT and Putty for resource management and utilization:
SecureCRT client for windows and Linux provides advanced options for session management and many other tasks that are needed for increasing and enhancing productivity.
Putty clients don’t possess that level of flexibility when it comes to provisioning advanced features like SecureCRT where Putty provides general features for manipulation.
It helps in streamlining activities, unlike Putty by providing secure access for remote connection, file transfer, and data migration or channeling through the proper way to the required project.
SecureCRT gives the end-user proper highlighted segments to identify the error and logs to perform better troubleshooting which means it gives exact and proper highlights to the user in many ways of resolving network or routing-related issues very easily.
Unlike Putty which needs a lot of tabs to be opened with duplicate sessions and then managing the overall server quality same is not the case with SecureCRT. SecureCRT helps in providing proper utility to manage multiple tabs into one place thus providing easy access and reliability with a lot of toggling when compared to putty.
Although Putty supports for SSH client it does possess some of the protocols related to SSH and SFTP client for Windows.
Bitwise is proper support for putty with the following features to get in like FTP protocol transfer to SFTP protocol through a bridge.
Bitwise SSH client also has an auto-reconnecting pattern or say feature with remote desktop to be provided using a channel or tunnel, also allows port-forwarding with proxy integrated into one and also includes a graphical interface which is not present in the exact Putty.
Extension to the Bitwise SSH client there exists a Bitwise SSH server with Putty which has an SSH, SCP, and SFTP server. It also includes a lot of installation, usage and supports a lot of SSH clients like OpenSSH and Putty.
Putty supports many SSH encryption keys like AES, DES, and a lot of public-key authentication techniques but still, the Encryption keys and technologies present in SecureCRT is more prone and advanced in support to security and manipulation for security keys.
There are other substituents that exist and make use of Puttylike WinSCP, Teraterm, and minty but a lot more exploration needs to be done for it.
Putty supports port forwarding which makes use of local, remote and dynamic forwarding with many protocols, and the port forwarding which it supports includes IPV4 and IPV6 support for intercommunication between the network and the machine as a node.
On other hand, SecureCRT also supports and handles local sessions to be managed and in advancement with the same productivity and enhancement to be expected in parallel.
SecureCRT supports a lot of scripting languages that make the accessibility a bit easier and simpler when compared to Putty which supports mostly bash scripting when it comes to implementation and other deployment activities.
iTerm2, Hyper Terminal, Cmder, and ConEmu are other alternatives that can be used for the same task to be performed which SecureCRT and Putty work for.
Since Putty has been developed long back and came early to the market with all the bare minimum requirements to support for network transfer and session management number of users and developers associated with it are more as compared to SecureCRT which came into the exploration phase later than Putty.
Just because of the cost factor involved SecureCRT users and privileges are less as compared to Putty which has many variants like Putty client and Putty server also involved in it.
Conclusion
Both SecureCRT and Putty have the same working objective but have differences when it comes to making the entire system robust and functional. SecureCRT is having more features and plugins as compared to Putty but is less adaptable due to its cost associated with it which is not the case with Putty. Putty is open-source and free of cost which attracts more users for performing any task related to networking.
Recommended Articles
This is a guide to SecureCRT vs Putty. Here we discuss the key differences with infographics and comparison table, respectively. You may also have a look at the following articles to learn more –
